Monday, July 18, 2011

Diversity Dominates Forbes Top 100 Power Women

  
 

     
Copyright 2009 by SpreePiX
Image Copyright by SpreePiX

The legendary Forbes has come out with a new list on October 6, 2010 showcasing the world's most powerful women in 2010 who could surely take themselves straight into the next decade. The Forbes list has been praised as "Diverse" by Jenna Goudreau, a Forbes blogger herself, and "a new ranking of the female power elite that reflects the New Order of now" by ABC News.
It seems everyone has something to be happy about in the debut of the world's top 100 power women. From CEO's to chancellors and performing artists and news anchors, the Forbes list displays an array of worldy talent. Topping the #1 spot is first lady Michelle Obama. Forbes calls her "A fashion icon and an athletic mother of two, she's Jackie Kennedy with a law degree from Harvard and street sense from Chicago's South Side." According to America, she deserves it as 54% of Americans still view her favorably. America can also be pleased that Irene Rosenfeld, chief executive of Kraft foods, came in close second. India can also be proud that three ambitious women have been named on the list. They include Indra Nooyi as CEO of Pepsi CO, Shikha Sharma of Axis Bank, and Chanda Kocchar of ICICI Bank. Kocchar has been described as "the first woman to run a large Indian bank". Germany's chancellor, Angela Merkel, is at #4 and is praised for her work on tax and education reforms for next year. In the far east, Ho Ching of Singapore clocks in at #30 as chief executive of Temasek Holdings, wife of Singapore's current Prime Minister.
From France to the United Arab Emirates, these women have been kicking on as both powerful and admirable. Up with the CEO's and chancellors are young talents such as Beyonce Knowles and Lady Gaga. Gaga followers will agree that she is like the supermom of the pop-powerhouse, once telling a discouraging ex-boyfriend that "one day, I will become so famous that you won't be able to walk into a coffee shop without hearing my voice" - and live up to that, she did! At #7, and only 24 years old, she has a strong foothold on countries across the world such as the UK and Japan.
According to Forbes, as for the media, these rankings were based "less on traditional titles and roles and more on creative influence and entrepreneurship," which is a big move forward in the world of show business, but also in the other industries that women are continuing to dominate.

Tags: Forbes, Forbes List, Lady Gaga, 100 Most Powerful...
  

Andy Murray Vs. Rafael Nadal In Wimbledon   [Report Abuse]  

Posted by: topicaltv     

Andy Murray is ready to seize his best-ever chance to serve up history at Wimbledon.

The flying Scot landed a knockout punch to reach his second successive Centre Court semi-final.

Murray relaxed by reading a boxing magazine before flooring Muhammad Ali lookalike Jo-Wilfried Tsonga with a heavyweight display of hitting.

He plays world number one Rafael Nadal on Friday in the most hotly anticipated match of his SW19 career.

Murray is now the shortest odds he's ever been to become the first man to lift the Wimbledon men's singles trophy since Stockport's Fred Perry in 1936.

“It would be incredible. Winning a Grand Slam is obviously why you play the game. If it was here, to win the first one, that would make it extra special,” he said. “But I'm a long, long way from doing that. Six sets away, and have to beat the number one in the world if I even want to have a chance of doing that.

“It's been a huge wait for us and it's still going on now. The crowd would love to see a British player win Wimbledon.”

He will serve for a place in his first-ever Wimbledon final on what millions of fans hope will be a fantastic Friday for British tennis.


 

Nadal beat him in straight sets when they met in the quarter-finals at the All England Club two years ago on his way to the winning the title, but Murray was shattered after an epic five set marathon to overcome Richard Gasquet just 48 hours earlier and will be out to gain revenge.

Although the Spaniard is favourite, their head-to-head record in Grand Slams is two matches each, with Murray yet to reach the top of his game.

“He would definitely be favourite for the match with his results here the last few years. I know it's going to be an incredibly difficult match to win, but one I believe I can if I play well,” added Murray.

Whoever wins knows they will not have to face Roger Federer on Sunday after the defending champion's shock exit at the hands of Tomas Berdych. Federer said Murray could be on course to take his crown: “Andy is a fantastic player and he's got all the chances to win here. We all know that.”

Britain's number one eventually put in an absolutely fabulous performance, with comedienne Jennifer Saunders looking on from the royal box.

Frenchman Tsonga threatened an upset when he took the first set on a tie break. But the fourth seed raised his game as he began to read his opponent's power serve.

Murray won a crucial second set tie-break and then took full advantage against a tiring Tsonga to secure a 6-7 7-6 6-2 6-2 quarter final victory.

“It was a really tough first couple of sets. I was just having to hang in there,” added Murray.

Thursday, June 23, 2011

Update news24

Washington (CNN) -- President Barack Obama goes on the road Thursday to sell his plan to withdraw 33,000 U.S. forces from Afghanistan.
He will meet with soldiers from the 10th Mountain Division at Fort Drum, New York -- many of whom have recently returned from Afghan deployments.
France announced on Thursday that it would follow suit, saying it "will initiate a progressive withdrawal of troops in Afghanistan, and will follow a timetable comparable to the withdrawal of the American troops."
French President Nicolas Sarkozy's office said the withdrawal will be done in consultation with NATO allies and the Afghan government.
All French soldiers could be out of Afghanistan by 2013, French Defense Minister Gerard Longuet told France Info radio Thursday.
Obama announced Wednesday night that all the additional U.S. forces he ordered to Afghanistan in December 2009 will be home within 15 months.


In a nationally televised address from the East Room of the White House, Obama said 10,000 of the "surge" forces would withdraw by the end of this year, and the other 23,000 would leave Afghanistan by September 2012.
Calling the deployment of the surge "one of the most difficult decisions that I've made as president," Obama said the military campaign was "meeting our goals" in Afghanistan and the drawdown would begin "from a position of strength."
"Al Qaeda is under more pressure than at any time since 9/11," Obama said. "Together with the Pakistanis, we have taken out more than half of al Qaeda's leadership. And thanks to our intelligence professionals and special forces, we killed Osama bin Laden, the only leader that al Qaeda had ever known. This was a victory for all who have served since 9/11."
At the same time, Obama said the Afghanistan drawdown and the simultaneous winding down of the war in Iraq would help the United States begin to refocus attention and resources on efforts to resolve economic and other problems and to unify a politically divided nation.
"America, it is time to focus on nation building here at home," the president said.
Afghanistan's defense ministry said Thursday it "respects the decision of the U.S. government and the U.S. people" and is ready to take up the slack as U.S. forces begin to pull out.
"Based on quantity and quality developments, the ... Afghan National Army is ready to cover the gap," the ministry said.
The Taliban called Obama's announcement "only ... a symbolic step which will never satisfy the war weary international community or the American people."
"The assertion of American leaders about making headway in Afghanistan and Obama's proclamation of them being in a stronger position are nothing more than baseless claims and propaganda," the group said in a statement released Thursday.
RELATED TOPICS
  • Barack Obama
  • Afghanistan
  • Military and Defense Policy
The troop withdrawals from Afghanistan will begin next month, as Obama promised when he ordered the surge in a speech 18 months ago at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, New York.
After the departure of all the surge forces, the total U.S. military deployment in Afghanistan will be slightly fewer than 70,000 troops.
Obama's time frame will give U.S. commanders another two "fighting" seasons with the bulk of U.S. forces still available for combat operations.
It also will bring the surge troops home before the November 2012 election in which Obama will seek a second term.
Initial reaction was varied, with outgoing Defense Secretary Robert Gates supporting Obama's decision while congressional leaders were divided between those who wanted a faster withdrawal and others calling for caution in leaving Afghanistan.
"It's important that we retain the flexibility necessary to reconsider troop levels and respond to changes in the security environment should circumstances on the ground warrant," said House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, in a statement. "Congress will hold the administration accountable for ensuring that the pace and scope of the drawdown does not undermine the progress we've made thus far."
Sen. John McCain, R-Arizona, was more blunt, saying: "This is not the 'modest' withdrawal that I and others had hoped for and advocated."
Democratic colleagues of Obama expressed support for starting the withdrawal but said more troops should be included and they should depart faster than the president announced.
"It has been the hope of many in Congress and across the country that the full drawdown of U.S. forces would happen sooner than the president laid out -- and we will continue to press for a better outcome," House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-California, said in a statement.
Two candidates for the Republican presidential nomination to run against Obama next year expressed reservations about the withdrawal strategy, but differed in their reasoning.
"We all want our troops to come home as soon as possible, but we shouldn't adhere to an arbitrary timetable on the withdrawal" from Afghanistan, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney said in a statement. "This decision should not be based on politics or economics."
In his own statement, former Utah Gov. Jon Huntsman, who was Obama's ambassador to China until recently, called for shifting the Afghanistan mission to "a focused counterterror effort which requires significantly fewer boots on the ground than the president discussed tonight."
"We need a safe but rapid withdrawal, which encourages Afghans to assume responsibility, while leaving in place a strong counterintelligence and special forces effort proportionate to the threat," Huntsman said.
The killing of bin Laden in early May and the success in reversing Taliban momentum in the southern provinces of Helmand and Kandahar enabled the beginning of a troop withdrawal that will culminate with handing over security responsibilities to Afghan forces in 2014, the senior administration officials said on condition of not being identified.
Gates -- along with Afghan war commander Gen. David Petraeus -- had pushed for an initial drawdown of 3,000 to 5,000 troops this year, according to a congressional source. Gates also urged the president to withdraw support troops only -- not combat troops.
Obama, however, ultimately decided to adopt the more aggressive withdrawal plan. The senior administration officials said Obama's withdrawal schedule fell within the range of options presented to him by Petraeus.
In a statement after Obama's speech, Gates said it was "critical" that U.S. forces continue to "aggressively" carry out the surge strategy of degrading the capability of the Taliban while bolstering Afghan security forces.
"I support the president's decision because it provides our commanders with enough resources, time and, perhaps most importantly, flexibility to bring the surge to a successful conclusion," Gates said, signaling Pentagon control in deciding which U.S. forces to withdraw.
Public exhaustion with the conflict is reflected in recent public opinion polls. Nearly three-quarters of Americans support the United States pulling some or all of its forces from Afghanistan, according to a June 3-7 CNN/Opinion Research Corp. survey.
That figure jumped 10 points since May, likely as a result of the death of bin Laden, pollsters said.
The United States has spent roughly $443 billion on the war in Afghanistan, according to budget analysts. According to Travis Sharp, a researcher at the Center for a New American Security, the troop reductions Obama announced would bring a savings of about $7 billion in fiscal year 2012.
Senior administration officials told CNN that planning for the announcement began in January, when the president summoned top members of his national security team into the Oval Office and tasked them with coming up with a plan for the drawdown.
The calculations that went into the drawdown decision included the fact that "remarkable" and "unexpected" progress had been made degrading al-Qaeda's infrastructure in its bases in the tribal regions of Pakistan over the prior 18 months, one of the officials said.
Additionally, the Taliban have been rolled back from their heartland regions in southern and southwestern Afghanistan, both in northern and southern Helmand Province and around the key city of Kandahar, which had been their de facto capital. This progress fulfilled the administration's pledge to reverse the momentum of the Taliban, which had been one of the key rationales for the surge.
Another factor favoring the drawdown was the growth in Afghan army and police forces of 100,000 men in the past year, the officials said.
CNN's Saskya Vandoorne, Barbara Starr, Ted Barrett, Deirdre Walsh, Tom Cohen, Alan Silverleib and Brianna Keilar, Ben Brumfeld and CNN National Security Analyst Peter Bergen contributed to this report.